- اداره کل حفاظت محیط زیست استان آذربایجان غربی. (1389). برنامه مدیریت جامع دریاچه ارومیه.
- ایزدی مهر، ن. (1393). برآورد ارزش کارکردهای غیربازاری دریاچه ارومیه: رهیافت آزمون انتخاب. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ارومیه.
- رجبی هشجین، م. سراوانی، س. نوربخش، ا. و تجریشی، م. (1394). ضرورت احیای دریاچه ارومیه، علل خشکی و تهدیدات. ستاد احیای دریاچه ارومیه.
- صالح نیا، م. (1395). بررسی ناهمگنی ترجیحات خانوارها در رابطه با احیای دریاچه ارومیه با استفاده از مدلهای کلاس پنهان چندسطحی و بیزین سلسله مراتبی. رساله دکتری، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز.
- صالح نیا، م. حیاتی، ب. قهرمانزاده، م. و مولائی، م. (1392). برآورد ارزش بهبود وضعیت زیست محیطی دریاچه ارومیه: کاربرد روش آزمون انتخاب. نشریه اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی. جلد 27، (4): 276-267.
- ملیکی اسفنجانی، م. (1390). برآورد ارزش حفاظتی دریاچه ارومیه از دیدگاه مردم شهرهای ارومیه و تبریز. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز.
Refrences
- Aitkin, M. (1999). A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance componentsin generalized linear model. Biometrics, 55: 117-128.
- Asparouhov, T. & Muthen, B.O. (2008). Multilevel Mixture Models, in Hancock G.R. and Samuelsen K.M. (eds). Advances in latent variable mixture models, IAP.
- Bartholomew, D.J. & Knott, M. (1999). Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis, London: Arnold.
- Bateman, I.J., Day, B.H., Georgiou, S. & Lake, I. (2006). The aggregation ofenvironmental benefit values: welfare measures: distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics, 60: 450–460.
- Birol, E. & Das, S. (2010). Estimating the value of improved wastewater treatment: the case of River Ganga, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 2163–2171.
- Brouwer, R., Martin-Ortega, J. & Berbel, J. (2010). Spatial preference heterogeneity: a choice experiment. Land Economics, 86: 552–568.
- Duran, R., Farizo, B. A. & Vazquez, M. X. (2015). Conservation of maritime cultural heritage: A discrete choice experiment in a European Atlantic Region. Marine Policy, 51: 356-365.
- Farizo, B. A., Joyce, J. & Solino, M. (2014a). Dealing with heterogeneous preferences using multilevel mixed models. Land Economics, 90: 181-198.
- Farizo, B. A., Louviere, J. J. & Solino, M. (2014b). Mixed integration of individual background, attitudes and tastes for landscape management. Land Use Policy, 38: 477-486.
- Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2003).Fisheries Management 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO technical guidelines for fisheries. Rome.
- Haghjou, M., Hayati, B., Pishbahar, E. & Molaei, M. (2016). Using the contingent ranking approach to assess the total economic valuation the of arasbaran forests in iran. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 31(2):87-102.
- Hanley, N., Mourato, S. & Wright, R. (2001). Choice modeling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15: 435-462.
- Hanley, N., Schläpfer, F. & Spurgeon, J. (2003). Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management, 68: 297–304.
- Hensher, D.A. & Greene, W.H. (2003). The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30, 133–176.
- Johnston, R.J. & Ramachandran, M. (2014). Modeling spatial patchiness and hot spotsin stated preference willingness to pay. Environmental Resources Economics, 59: 363–387.
- Kaffashi, S., Shamsudin, M.N., Radam, A., Rahim, K.A. & Yacob, M.R. (2013). We are willing to pay to support wetland conservation: local users’ perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Development of World Ecology, 20: 325–335.
- Kuhfeld, W. F. (2010). Marketing research methods in SAS. SAS institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
- Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D., Swait, J. & Adamowicz, W. (2000). Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models, in Kaplan D. (ed.). The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, 175-198. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
- Martín-López, B., Montes, C. & Benayas, J. (2007). Influence of user characteristics on valuation of ecosystem services in Doíana Natural Protected Area (south-west Spain). Environmental Conservation, 34: 215–224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907004067.
- Rose, J. M. & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2013). Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments. Transportation, 40: 1021-1041.
- Skrondal, A. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2007). Latent variable modeling: a survey. Board of the Foundation of the Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34: 712-745.
- Upton, V., Dhubháin, Á.N. & Bullock, C. (2012). Preferences and values for afforestation: the effects of location and respondent understanding on forest attributes in a labelled choice experiment. Forest Policy Economics, 23: 17–27.
- Vecchiato, D. & Tempesta, T. (2012). Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments. Forest Policy Economics, 26: 111–120.
- Vermunt, J. K. (2003). Multilevel latent class models. Sociological Methodology, 33: 213-239.
- Vermunt, J. K. (2008). Latent class and finite mixture models for multilevel data sets. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17: 33-51.
- Vermunt, J. K. & Magidson, J. (2005). Technical guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: basic and advanced. Statistical Innovations Inc.
- Vermunt, J. K. & Magidson, J. (2014). Upgrade Manual for Latent GOLD Choice 5.0: Basic, Advanced, and Syntax. Belmont Massachusetts: Statistical Innovations Inc.
- Vermunt, J. K. & Van Dijk, L. A. (2001). A non-parametric random-coefficient approach: the latent class regression model, Multilevel Modeling Newsletter, 13: 6-13.
- Vollmer, D. Ryffel, A.N. Djaja, K. & Gret-Regamey, A. (2016). Examining demand for urban river rehabilitation in Indonesia: Insights from a spatially explicit discrete choice experiment. Land Use Policy, 57: 514-525.
- Wang, H., He, J., Kim, Y. & Kamata, T. (2013). Willingness-to-pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: an empirical test on the ordering effects of multiple-bounded discrete choices. Journal of Environmental Management, 131C: 256–269.
- Zander, K.K., Garnett, S.T. & Straton, A. (2010). Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation-willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 2519–2528.
- Zander, K.K., Signorello, G., DE Salvo, M., Gandini, G. & Drucker, A.G. (2013). Assessing the total economic value of threatened livestock breeds in Italy: implications for conservation policy. Ecological Economics, 93: 219–229.
- Zander, K.K., Pang, S.T., Jinam, C., & Tuen, A.A. & Garnett, S.T. (2014). Wild and valuable? Tourist values for orang-utan conservation in sarawak. Conservative Society, 12: 27.
)
