طراحی پروفیل ریسک محصول خربزه شهرستان مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. ایران

2 گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران. ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: بخش کشاورزی و فعالیت­های مرتبط با آن دارای ویژگی­های خاصی است، که آن را به شدت در معرض خطرات و آسیب­های متعدد و غیرقابل پیش­بینی و در نتیجه خسارات و مشکلات فراوان قرار داده است.  بنابراین، شناسایی و ارزیابی این خطرات و آسیب­­ها می­تواند کشاورزان را در اتخاذ تصمیم­گیری­ صحیح یاری نماید. هدف از مطالعۀ حاضر، شناسایی و ارزیابی ریسک­های تولید محصول خربزه و تهیۀ پروفیل ریسک­هایِ تولید این محصول می­باشد.
مواد و روش­ها: برای ارزیابی خسارت هر یک از ریسک­هایِ تولید از دو معیار فراوانی وقوع و میزان اثر ریسک و در نهایت از ماتریس ریسک استفاده شده است. حجم نمونۀ مورد مطالعه با استفاده از نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده تعیین و اطلاعات از طریق مصاحبۀ حضوری با 50 کشاورز خربزه­کار شهرستان مشهد در سال 1398 جمع­آوری گردید.
یافته­ها: نتایج حاصل نشان می­دهد بزرگترین ناحیۀ ریسکی از لحاظ فراوانی ریسک و اثر ریسک به ناحیۀ پنجم شامل ریسک خشکسالی، آفات، بیماری­های مختلف، پرندگان و مگس خربزه و سپس ناحیۀ اول با 4 ریسک و ناحیۀ دوم و سوم هر کدام با 1 ریسک اختصاص دارد.
بحث و نتیجه­گیری: استفاده از پروفیل ریسک برای طراحی الگوها و پوشش بیمه­ای متناسب با ریسک­ها برای کاهش زیان وارده به صندوق بیمه و تحت پوشش قرار گرفتن ریسک­های اصلی و مهم در تولید خربزه برای افزایش تقاضای بیمه پیشنهاد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing risk profile of melon product of Mashhad city

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sima Ghazanfari 1
  • Mohammad Ghorbani 1
  • Arash Dourandish 2
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, University of Ferdowsi, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Economics and Agricultural Development, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The agricultural sector and its related activities have certain characteristics, which expose it to numerous unforeseen risks and damages, resulting in multiple losses and problems. Therefore, identifying and evaluating these risks and damages can help farmers make the right decisions. The purpose of the present study is to identify and evaluate melon crop production risks, and to prepare risk profiles for this crop.
Materials and Methods: Two criteria of frequency of occurrence and extent of risk, and finally risk matrix were used to assess the damage of each production risks. The sample size was determined based on simple random sampling procedure and the data were collected through face-to-face interviews with 50 melon farmers in Mashhad in 2019.
Findings: Study findings suggest that the largest risk area in terms of risk frequency and risk effect is assigned to the fifth area including drought risk, pests, various illnesses, birds and melon fly, following by the first area with 4 risks and the second and third areas with 1 risk.
Conclusion: We highly recommend the use of risk profiles to design patterns and insurance coverage which fits various risks. As a result, losses of insurance fund will mitigate and major and important risks in melon production will be covered, and thus, insurance demand will increase.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Production risk
  • melon
  • risk matrix
  • Classification criteria

مراجع

  1. Aditto S, Gan C, Nartea GV. Sources of risk and risk management strategies: the case of smallholder farmers in a developing economy. 2012; [DOI.org/10.5772/50392]
  2. Akbari A, Shahikitash MN, Yazdani F. Factor affecting pistachio production uncertainty in Sirjan (Using Tobit regression. 2014; 6(3): 175-190. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=416947
  3. Amouzad khalili M, Gholami ZA, Ghalee P, Poortrogeni M. Investigating the effective factors on encouraging farmers to insure rice crop in Behshahr city. 2013; https://civilica.com/doc/284675/
  4. Alimi T, Wall A. Risk and risk management strategies in onion production in Kebbi state of Nigeria. 2005; 10 (1): 1-8. [DOI:1080/09718923.2005.11892452]
  5. Alizadeh E, Sheykhi M. Factors Affecting Farmers' Desire to Insure Agricultural Products (Case Study: Ramhormoz County). 2017; https://civilica.com/doc/808084/
  6. Azam Rahmati E, Kohansal MR, Ghorbani M. Survay of willing to participate wheat farmers of mashhad city in new method of agricultural insurance. 2015; 23(91): 135-158. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspxid=299207
  7. Aziz Nasiri S. Agricultural risk management using agricultural insurance based on climate indicators. 2011; (161): 34-48.

 http://noo.rs/WgTIb

  1. Bardhan DY, Dabas PS, Tewari SK. Kumar A. An assessment of risk attitude of dairy farmers in Uttaranchal (India). 2006; 12-18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23511336
  2. Boyd M, Pai J, Zhang Q, Holly Wang H, Wang K. Factors affecting crop insurance purchases in China: 2011; 3(4): 441-450.

[DOI.org/10.1108/17561371111192301]

  1. Ghasem Sh, Yavari K, Mahmoudvand R, Sahabi B, Naeimi A. New Method for Determining Insurability of Risks in Gas Refineries Using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method. 2015; 7(13):1-26.

www.magiran.com/p1413000

  1. Ghorbani M. Principles of agricultural insurance. 2018; Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad. https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/book-abstract-223768.html
  2. Ghorbani M, Jafari F. Role of RAIN-FED LENTIL risk profile in designing of insurance model (case study: Dry lentils North Khorasan province(. 2010; 1(1):85-100. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=115238
  3. Ghorbani M, Koochaki A, Kohansal MR, Jafari F. Application of risk profile in crop products risk management of north Khorasan province (case study of sugar beet(. 2009; 3(3):31-48. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=122012
  4. Girdziute L. Risks in agriculture and opportunities of their integrated evaluation. 2012; 62: 783-790. [DOI:org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.132]
  5. Hewett CJM. Quinn PF, Whitehead PG, Heath waite AL, Flynn NJ. Towards a nutrient export risk matrix approach to managing agricultural pollution at source. 2004; 8(4): 834-845. [DOI:5194/hess-8-834-2004]
  6. Jabal Amelli M, Rezaei­far A, Chaei Bakhsh Langeroudi A. Ranking project risks using MADM methodologies. Tehran Univ. 2008; 41(7): 863-871. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=72711
  7. Karbasi A. Survey of farmers' attitudes and factors affecting the acceptance of agricultural insurance. 2000; http://www.sbkiran.ir/sites/default/files/pdf/6.pdf
  8. Keegan M. The Orange Book: Management of risk - Principles and Concepts. 2004; 1-52. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/191513/The_Orange_Book.pdf
  9. Klein JH, Cork RB. An approach to technical risk assessment. 1998; 16(6): 345-351.

[DOI.org/10.1016/S02637863(98)00006-4]

  1. Mc Dermott RE, Mikulak RJ, Beauregard, MR. The basic of FMEA. Quality Resources. 1996; 12. https://elsmar.com
  2. Meshkouh R, Mohammadi F, Rahimi S. The role of risk profiles in risk management of agricultural products insurance fund. 2011; https://www.symposia.ir/INSD18.
  3. Mousavi M. Ghanian M. Risk and risk management in agriculture with emphasis on agricultural insurance. 2012; http://research.asnrukh.ac.ir/webdocument/load.action?webdocument_code=3000&masterCode=93002011
  4. Murray SL, Grantham K, Damle SB. Development of a generic risk matrix to manage project risks. 2011; 5(1): 35-51.

http://www.jise.ir/article_4040.html

  1. Nejatianpour E, Ghodoosi M, Hasanpour J. Application of Risk Profile in Saffron Risk Management. 2018; 6 (4): 513-528.

[DOI:10.22048/jsat.2018.92906.1249]

  1. Niyakan L. What is risk management? 2013; (186): 16-25. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/327400
  2. Qing-Song WANG. The farmers behavior in agricultural insurance under the Von Neuman-Morgenstern utility model. 2010; 1: 226-229.

[DOI:10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.028]

  1. Rahimi H, Kakhki A, Rahimi H, Araghi M. Dadmand M. Effecting of traps plants to reduce infestation of pests melon in Khorasan Razavi province. 2015; 83(2):268-266. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=529843
  2. Razzaghi Borkhani F, Rezvanfar A, Movahed Mohammadi H. Hejazi, Y. Mechanisms of reducing natural disasters and risk management to the sustainable of citrus garden in Mazandaran province. 2017; 4(3):35-52. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=334675
  3. Segal S. Risk Identification: A critical First Step in Enterprise Risk Management. 2008; 29-32. https://web.actuaries.ie/sites/default/files/erm-resources/rmn-2008-iss13-segal.pdf
  4. Sherafat S, Ghanbari F, Hoseini Risk and Water Management. 2014; 1(2): 15-21

 [DOI:10.22067/jwsd.v1i2.39596]

  1. Statistics of Khorasan Razavi Agricultural Jihad Organization. 2018; https://koaj.ir/modules/showframework.aspx?RelFacilityId=1241&ObjectID=851&FrameworkPageType=SEC
  2. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture Department of Khorasan Razavi Province. 2017;

https://khrazavi.mporg.ir/Portal/View/Page.aspx?PageId=6281233c-30bf-45df-8d6b-c8d227c77628&t=29

  1. Stoneberner G, Goguen A, Feringa A. Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. 2002; [DOI:6028/NIST.SP.800-30]
  2. Sundar J, Ramakrishnan L. A study on farmers’ awareness, perception and willing to join and pay for crop insurance. 2013; 2(1): 48-54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321376326
  3. Teymouri M. Mikaeili M. Investigating the factor affecting the acceptance of agriculture products insurance (case study of South Fendersk village of Ramyan city) .2013; https://elmnet.ir/article/20145321-51282
  4. Wang M, Ye T, Shi P. Factors affecting farmers’ crop insurance participation in China. 2016; 64(3): 479-492. [DOI:1111/CJAG.12088]
  5. Yaghoubi A, Chizari M, Feli S, Pezeshki Rad Factors Influencing Risk Management among the Farmers of the Rain fed Wheat: Tafresh Region Case Study. 2011; 6(1):91-101. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=138217
  6. Yan J. Disaster Risk Assessment. Training workshop on trought risk assessment for the agriculture sector.  2010; http://www.wamis.org/agm/meetings/slovenia10/S5-2b-GRIP_Understanding_Risk_Assessment.pdf
  7. Yearbook of Agricultural Jihad of Khorasan Razavi Province. 2015;

https://koaj.ir/modules/showframework.aspx?RelFacilityId=1241&ObjectID=851&FrameworkPageType=SEC

  1. Zamani GHA, Karami EA, Yazdanpanah M. Factors effecting farmers crop insurance satisfaction. 2009; 4(2): 53-65. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=111445
فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی
دوره 13، شماره 4
بهمن 1400
صفحه 78-93

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 12 شهریور 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 05 دی 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 19 مهر 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار