بهینه‌سازی یارانه صادراتی پرتقال و اثر آن بر رفاه عرضه‌کنندگان این محصول در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• سید علی حسینی یکانی ¹
• فاطمه کشیری کلائی ²
• طاهره رنجبر ملکشاه ³

¹ دانشیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

² دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی- دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و مناب طبیع ساری

³ دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری

10.30495/jae.2022.21475.2020

چکیده

به‌منظور توسعه صادرات بخش کشاورزی و با وجود اهمیتی که تولید مرکبات در این بخش دارا می‌باشد، لازم است جهت استفاده از ظرفیت‌های تولید این محصولات در ایران و کسب درآمد از طریق آنها در بازارهای جهانی، حمایت‌های لازم از تولیدکنندگان در زمینه صادرات صورت گیرد. در این راستا در مطالعه حاضر با استفاده از یک مدل برنامه‌ریزی ریاضی، نرخ بهینه یارانه صادرات پرتقال محاسبه و اثر آن بر رفاه عرضه‌کنندگان داخلی پرتقال سنجیده شده است. اطلاعات مورد نیاز در این مطالعه مبتنی بر داده‌های سال 1396 بوده که به‌صورت کتابخانه‌ای جمع‌آوری گشته است. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن است که یارانه صادرات وضع شده برای پرتقال در سال 1396 بهینه نبوده و برای بهینه‌سازی بایستی از 5000 ریال به 7918 ریال به ازای هر کیلوگرم صادرات پرتقال افزایش یابد. با پرداخت این میزان یارانه، میزان صادرات و عرضه پرتقال به‌ترتیب حدود 73/06 و 0/41 درصد افزایش یافته و میزان تقاضا حدود 0/66 درصد کاهش می‌یابد. افزایش عرضه در کنار افزایش قیمت‌های داخلی منجر به افزایش 0/82 درصدی در رفاه عرضه‌کنندگان این محصول می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• یارانه صادرات
• سیاست های حمایتی
• پرتقال
• بهینه سازی
• ایران

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimization of orange export subsidy and its effect on welfare of producer of this product in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

• Seyed-Ali Hosseini-Yekani ¹
• Fatemeh Kashiri Kolaei ²
• Tahereh Ranjbar Malekshah ³

¹ Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economic, Sari Agricultural Science and Natural Resources University

² Ph.D. of agricultural economics

³ Ph.D. Student in Agricultural Economics, Sari University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, Sari.

چکیده [English]

In order to develop agricultural exports and despite the importance of the production of citrus in this sector, should be provided the necessary support from the producers in the export, in order to use the production capacity of this products in Iran. In this regard, in the present study, using a mathematical programming model, the optimal level of subsidy for export of orange has been calculated and evaluated its effect on the welfare of the domestic suppliers of orange. The information required in this study was based on 2017, which has been collected in the form of documents. The results of the research indicate that the export subsidy for orange in 2017 has not been optimal and for optimization, the subsidy increases from 5,000 Rials to 7918 Rials per kg of orange exports. By paying this subsidy, the export and supply of orange increased by 73.6% and 0.41%, respectively, and demand decreased by 0.66%. Rising supply along with rising domestic prices will lead to 0.82% increase in the welfare of the orange suppliers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Export subsidy
• support policies
• orange
• optimization
• Iran

مراجع

1. Parsamanesh M. The role of export credits in the development of non-oil exports in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Business Research. 2006(24):23.
2. Cass RA. Trade subsidy law: Can a foolish inconsistency be good enough for government work. Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 1989;21:609.
3. Lueth E, Ruiz-Arranz M. A gravity model of workers' remittances. 2007.
4. Azimi H, Yahyazadehfar M. The effect of incentive programs and export supports on the trade of agricultural products. Economical Modeling. 2013;7(22):121-35.
5. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal. 1948;27(3):379-423.
6. Huang Q, Howitt R, Rozelle S. Estimating production technology for policy analysis: trading off precision and heterogeneity. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2012;38(2):219-33.
7. Wu X. A weighted generalized maximum entropy estimator with a data-driven weight. Entropy. 2009;11(4):917-30.
8. Mosavi SH. Evaluating the impacts of removing government protection policies in the Iranian wheat market using market equilibrium approach. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 2017;48(2):241-56.
9. Jihad MoA. 2016.
10. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2014.
11. Ravanistan K, Hashemi Kamangar SM. Strategic analysis of Mazandaran citrus cluster with SWOT approach. National Conference of Entrepreneurship and Management of Knowledge-Based Businesses; Mazandaran University2011. p. 14.
12. Zare S. Economic study of production and marketing of agricultural products in Fars province: Shiraz; 2007.
13. Commerce OoESotMo. investigating the effect of export subsidies. 2012.
14. Shahnoushi N, Amjadi A, Shahhosein Dastjerdi S. Evaluating the Effects of the Sefidrud Network Inflow Reduction on Crop Pattern in Central Valley of Guilan Province. Agricultural Economics and Development. 2014;22(2):201-41.
15. Tusi M, Yazdani S. Export subsidy in Iran's agricultural products trade. The 5th Biennial Conference on Agricultural Economy of Iran2005.
16. Estakhr M, Zibaei M, Tarazkar MH. Investigating Impact of Export Insurance Subsidy on Agricultural Export. Agricultural Economics. 2010;3(4):185-202.
17. Karimi F, Zahedi Keivan M. Optimal pattern for allocation of subsidies to agricultural sector, consumers and producers: application of interval analytic hierarchy process. Agricultural Economics Research. 2010;2(8):99-120.
18. Ghafari H, Pourkazemi M, Khodadkashi F, Younesi A. The Optimal Tax Rate as a Fiscal policy Tool: Dynamic Optimal Theory Approach. Journal of Tax Research. 2016;24(29):33-66.
19. Mai C-C, Hwang H. Optimal export subsidies and marginal cost differentials. Economics Letters. 1988;27(3):279-82.
20. Elbehri A, Leetmaa SE. How significant are export subsidies to agricultural trade? Trade and welfare implications of global reforms. 2001.
21. Permani R. Optimal export tax rates of cocoa beans: A vector error correction model approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2013;57(4):579-600.
22. Parajuli R, Sarangi S, Chang SJ, Hill RC. The United States-Canada softwood lumber trade: An actual versus optimal export tax. Forest Policy and Economics. 2016;73:112-9.
23. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).2016.
24. Iran CotIRo. 2016.
25. Arfini F, Donati M, Grossi L, Paris Q. Revenue and cost functions in PMP: a methodological integration for a territorial analysis of CAP. 2008.
26. Golan A, Judge G, Miller D. Maximum Entropy Econometrics: Robust Estimation with Limited Data (Chichester UK, John W iley). 1996.

2   Heckelei T, Britz W. Positive mathematical programming with multiple data points: a cross-sectional estimation procedure. Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales. 2000;57:27-50.

28. Sabouhi M, Ahmadpour M. Estimation of Iran agricultural products demand functions using mathematical programming (application of maximum entropy method). Agricultural Economics. 2012;6(1):71-91.

29.Shoushtarian A, Makshudeh M. Investigating the effect of Iran's wheat market liberalization on social welfare. Scientific Journal of Agriculture. 2004;30(1):13.

30. Mohammadi H, Karimi M. Globalization of the Economy and Its Impacts on Domestic Supply, Demand and Export of Pistachio in Iran: An Application of Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model. Journal of Economic Research and Policies. 2008;16(46):83-100.
31. Ahmadian M, Eslami M, Baghestani A. Evaluating welfare effects resulting from the advancement of corn production technology in Iran. Agricultural Promotion and Education Research. 2010;3(1):13.
32. Sabouhi M, Azadegan E. Irrigation water pricing: the case study of Mashhad-Chenaran Plain. 2014.
33. Keramatzadeh A, Joolaaie R. Investigating the Welfare Effects of Rice Pricing Polices in Iran. Agricultural Economics Research. 2019;11(43):73-94.