تأثیر سیاست‌ پولی بر ارزش افزوده بخش کشاورزی و زیر بخش‌های آن در اقتصاد ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• امیرعلی فرهنگ ¹
• رفیع حسنی مقدم ²
• آنیتا ابونوری ³
• علی محمدپور ⁴

¹ گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

² گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه دامغان، دامغان، ایران

³ کارشناسی ارشد، آمار اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

⁴ دانشجوی دکتری، علوم اقتصادی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

10.30495/jae.2023.30186.2330

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف: هدف از تحقیق حاضر، بررسی اثر سیاست پولی بر ارزش افزوده بخش کشاورزی و زیر بخش‌های آن (زراعی، دامی، جنگلداری و شیلات) است.

مواد و روش‌ها: جهت بررسی تحقیق از متغیرهای؛ نقدینگی، ارزش افزوده و سرمایه گذاری بصورت داده‌های سالانه طی دوره زمانی 1398- 1370 و روش اقتصاد سنجی GMM استفاده شده است.

یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان‌ می‌دهد، نقدینگی در کل بخش کشاورزی موجب افزایش 06/3 واحدی ارزش افزوده شده است، در حالی که نقدینگی در زیر بخش‌های زراعی، دامی، شیلات و جنگلداری به‌ ترتیب موجب افزایش 017/0، 76/2، 18/2 و 05/1 واحدی آن شده است

بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به نتایج تحقیق، سیاست‌های پولی در کارایی بخش کشاورزی موثر می‌باشند و با استناد به نتایج به دست آمده، هدایت نقدینگی موجود به سمت سرمایه‌گذاری در زیر بخش‌های پر بازده کشاورزی پیشنهاد می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• ارزش افزوده بخش کشاورزی
• سیاست پولی
• GMM

---

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Monetary Policy on Value-added of the Agricultural Sector and Its Subsectors in The Iranian Economy

نویسندگان [English]

• amirali farhang ¹
• Rafi Hasanimoghadam ²
• Anita Abounoori ³
• ali mohammadpour ⁴

¹ Department of Economics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Economics, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran

³ Master, Economics and Social Statistics, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

⁴ PhD student, Economics Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction:The aim of this research is to investigate the effect of monetary policy on the value added of the agricultural sector and its subsectors (crop, livestock, fisheries and forestry).

Materials and Methods: To investigate the research of the variables; Liquidity, value added, and investment as annual data from 1991-2019, and the GMM econometric method was used.

Findings: The results of the research show that liquidity in the entire agricultural sector has increased the value added by 3.06 units, While liquidity in the crop, livestock, fisheries and forestry sub-sectors has increased by 0.017, 2.76, 2.18 and 1.05 units, respectively

Conclusion: According to the research results, monetary policies are effective in the efficiency of the agricultural sector, and based on the obtained results, it is suggested to direct the available liquidity towards investment in the productive sub-sectors of agriculture.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• value added of agricultural sector
• monetary policy
• GMM

مراجع

1. Adongo, S. O., John, S. O., Zeph, P., & Muyima, R. N. Impact of monetary policy on the performance of agricultural sector in Kenya. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 2020; 4(7): 562-568.
2. Asongu A, Odhiambo N, Financial Access and Value Added in Sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical Evidence from the Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Service Sectors. World Affairs.2022; 185(2): 359-382. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00438200221080998
3. Asaleye A, MaimakoR, Lawal. A. Inegbedion H. Popoola O. Monetary policy channels and agricultural performance: evidence from Nigeria. Asian Economic and Financial Review.2021; 11(3): 205-218. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2021.113.205.218
4. Birch, I. .Agricultural productivity in Kenya: barriers and opportunities. 2018.
5. Benchimol J, Fourçans A, Central bank losses and monetary policy rules: a DSGE investigation. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2019 1;61:289-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.01.010
6. Bessler D. Relative prices and money: a vector autoregression on Brazilian data. American Journal of Agricultural 1984;66(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240612
7. Čermáková K. Filho E.Effects of Expansionary Monetary Policy on Agricultural Commodities Market. Sustainability. 2021 19;13(16):9317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169317
8. Chambers RG. Agricultural and financial market interdependence in the short run. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1984;66(1):12-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240611
9. Chowdhury A, Uddin M, Anderson K. Liquidity and macroeconomic management in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review. 20181;34:1-24.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2017.10.001
10. Dev SM. Transformation of Indian agriculture: Growth, inclusiveness and sustainability. InPresidential Address at the 78th Annual Conference of the Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, November 2018 (pp. 1-3).
11. S. Meyers, W. H. and Starleaf, D. R. The Impacts of US monetary policies on the farm sector. Paper presented at AAEA annual meeting. Iowa University. Ames, Iowa. 1985.
12. Ezu, G., & Nwobia, C. Effect of Monetary and Fiscal Policies on Agricultural Growth of Nigerian Economy. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research. 2023; 9(3): 98-103.
13. Feriansyah F, Achsani NA, Irawan T, Anggraeni L. The Impact of Fiscal and Monetary Policies on the Real Sector under Globalization. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 2021 7:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1949281
14. Fathi Aghababa M, Azizi K. Mahmoud Mahmoudzadeh. The effect of banking facilities in various economic sectors on the growth of value added of industry. services, agriculture and construction and housing. Economic Modeling Quarterly.2021 14 (2); 77-102(Persian).
15. Econometric Analysis. New Your University2007; 7th ed.
16. Hansson H,Pia Nilsson. Foundations of Agricultural Market Analysis and Agricultural Policy. 2021: 1252-1254. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbab021
17. Kabundi A, Mlachila M. The role of monetary policy credibility in explaining the decline in exchange rate pass-through in South Africa. Economic Modelling. 2019 1;79:173-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.10.010
18. Khatat M. H, Buessing-Loercks M, Fleuriet V. Alwazir J. Monetary Policy Under an Exchange Rate Anchor. IMF Working Papers. 2020;(180).
19. Lin C,He L. Targeted monetary policy and agriculture business loans. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 2020 1;54:101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101290
20. Lashkari M. Money, currency and banking. Payam Noor University Publications. Tehran.2010 pp :262-251(Persian).
21. Mashinini M, Dlamini S, Dlamini D. The effects of monetary policy on agricultural output and investment in Eswatini. International Journal of Economics and Financial Research. 2019 ;5(5): 94-99.
22. Mashinini M, Dlamini S. Dlamini D. The Effects of Monetary Policy on Agricultural Output in Eswatini. International Journal of Economics and Financial Research. 2019;5(5):94-9. https://doi.org/10.32861/ijefr.55.94.99
23. Mishkin F. Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. Journal of Economic perspectives. 1995 Dec;9(4):3-10.
24. Moreira R, Monte EZ. Reviewing monetary policy inertia and its effects: The fractional integration approach for an emerging economy. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2020 1;78:34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.05.006
25. Mahmoodgordi R, Khalilian S, Mortazavi A. Survey of the Impacts of Monetary and Fiscal Policies on Private Investment in Iranian Agricultural Sector, Agricultural Economic and Development.2012 ; 20(77): 81-99(Persian).
26. Ngong C. . Thaddeus K. Asah L. Ibe G. Onwumere J. Stock market development and agricultural growth of emerging economies in Africa. Journal of Capital Markets Studies.2022.
27. Obayelu A, Salau A. Agricultural response to prices and exchange rate in Nigeria: Application of co-integration and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). Journal of agricultural sciences. 2010 1;1(2):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766898.2010.11884656
28. Oboh V, Tule MK, Ebuh GU. Does Monetary Policy matter for Agricultural Sector Performance? Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. Changes. 2019;10(12). 7176/JESD/10-12-05
29. Orden D,Fackler P. Identifying monetary impacts on agricultural prices in VAR models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1989 1;71(2):495-502. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241620
30. Qolizadeh H, Nowrozi A. Faiz Abadi Y. Investigating the effect of the government's macroeconomic policies on the development of employment in the agricultural sector. Quarterly magazine of entrepreneurial strategies in agriculture. 2019; 7(14): 116-123(Persian).
31. Soliman D. The Impact of Monetary Policy Tools on Investment and Its Reflection on the Egyptian Agricultural Sector Using GARCH Model. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2022;100(1):49-67. 21608/ejar.2022.110882.1183
32. Salim Y, Ahmed A. Impact of monetary policy on agricultural domestic product and investmentin iraq for the period (1990-2014). The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science.2019 ;50(2): 557-566.
33. Shabani Kushalshahi Z, Mansour Tehranchian A. Mojavarian M. The effect of monetary policies on private sector investment in Iran's agricultural sub-sectors. Economic Growth and Development Research Quarterly. 2014; 1(2): 13-24(Persian).
34. Schuh G. The exchange rate and US agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1974;56(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.2307/1239342
35. Sheikhpour M, Nabiiyan S. The effect of monetary shocks on investment in Iran's agricultural sector.Journal of Agricultural Economics Research.2018 10 (4), 125-144(Persian).
36. Shei S. .The exchange rate and United States Agricultural Product Markets: A General Equilibrium Approach. PhD. dissertation. Purdue University. West Lafayette, Indiana. 1978. 
37. Starleaf D. Macroeconomic policies and their impact upon the farm sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1982 1;64(5):854-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240744
38. Wang J, Jiang J. Unsupervised deep clustering via adaptive GMM modeling and optimization. Neurocomputing. 2021 14;433:199-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.082

Wagan Z, Zhang C, Hakimzadi S. Shah M. Assessing the effect of monetary policy on agricultural growth and food prices. Agricultural Economics. 2018 26;64(11):499-507. https://doi.org/10.17221/295/2017-AGRICECON