ارزیابی آثار اقتصادی دانش فنی تولید سیب‌زمینی تراریخته مقاوم به آفت بید سیب‌زمینی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

عضو هیئت علمی مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان گلستان- سازمان تات

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر با هدف ارزیابی آثار اقتصادی کاربست دانش فنی تولید سیب‌زمینی تراریخته (اصلاح ژنتیکی شده) مقاوم به آفت بید در مزارع سیب‌زمینی کاری کشور انجام شده است. بر مبنای یافته‌های تحقیق، نرخ بازده داخلی کشت بذور سیب‌زمینی تراریخته مقاوم به آفت بید در مزارع سیب‌زمینی‌کاری کشور 97% ، نسبت فایده به هزینه بیشتر از یک و برابر 4/41 و ارزش کنونی خالص منافع آن نیز حدود 496725384897 ریال پیش‌ بینی می‌شود. این یافته‌‌ها به‌طور کلی نشان می‌دهد که سرمایه‌گذاری یا تخصیص اعتبار به پروژه‌های پژوهشی منتج به این دانش فنی از نظر اقتصادی توجیه‌پذیر و مقبول بوده و پیش‌بینی می‌شود کاربست آن ضمن کاهش خسارت عملکردی و هزینه تولید سیب‌زمینی، منافع اقتصادی و اجتماعی تولیدکنندگان، مصرف‌کنندگان و دیگر ذینفعان این محصول را افزایش دهد و در دستیابی به امنیت غذایی نقش شایسته‌ای را ایفا نماید. این نتایج شواهدی مستند از بازده اقتصادی پذیرفتنی تحقیقات بیوتکنولوژی کشاورزی است که می‌تواند سیاست-گذاران و برنامه‌ریزان اقتصادی کشور را به ضرورت توجه هر چه بیشتر به تحقیقات کشاورزی و تامین مالی شایسته آن متقاعد نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Economic Impact Assessment of Technical knowledge of Transgenic Potato Production Resistant to Potato Willow

نویسنده [English]

  • NOORMOHAMMAD ABYAR
agricultural and natural resource research and educaTion of Ggolestan province
چکیده [English]

Tthe present study was conducted to assessment the economic impacts of applying the technical knowledge of producing transgenic (genetically modified) willow-resistant potatoes in the country's potato fields. Based on the research findings, the internal rate of return for cultivation of willow-resistant transgenic potato seeds in the country's potato fields is 97% , benefit cost ratio more than one and equal to 41.4 and Its net present value is estimated at 496725384897 Rials. These findings generally show that investing or allocating credit to research projects resulting from this technical knowledge is economically justifiable and acceptable and its application is expected to reduce the yield loss and production cost of potato, economic and social benefits of producers, consumers and other stakeholders. Increase this product and play a worthy role in achieving food security. These results are documentary evidence of the acceptable economic returns of agricultural biotechnology research that can convince policy makers and economic planners of the country to pay more attention to agricultural research and its proper financing.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Economic Impact Assessment
  • Biotechnology
  • Transgenic Potato
  • Benefit Cost Ratio
  • Modoodi Arkhodi, M, Boroumand, R, Akbari, A. Explain the resilience of rural areas against natural hazards with emphasis on floods, Journal of Natural Hazards, 2020: 9(23): 151-172.

https://jneh.usb.ac.ir/article_4952.html?lang=fa

  • Anabostani, A, Javanshiri, M, Mahmoodi, H. Spatial analysis of the level of resilience of rural settlements against environmental hazards (Case study: Central part of Farooj city), Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 2018: 4(4): 18-34.

https://system.khu.ac.ir/jsaeh/index.php?slc_lang=fa&sid=1

  • Dyke, G, S, Gill, R, Davies, F, Betorz, Y, Andalsvik, J, E, Lamboglia. Dream project: Applications of earth observations to disaster risk management. Acta Astronautica, 2011, 68(1): 301-315.

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AcAau.68.301D/abstract

  • Salmani, M, Badri, a, Kazemi, N. Evaluation of community resilience approach in the face of natural hazards studied: Damavand city, Journal of Risk Knowledge, 2016: 2(4): 393-409.

https://jhsci.ut.ac.ir/article_58266.html?lang=fa

  • Vali, Abbas Ali, Mehrabi, M, Analysis of resilience and socio-economic vulnerability of urban communities to drought Case study: Yazd province, Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 2021: 8(1): 215-232.

https://system.khu.ac.ir/jsaeh/article-1-3132-en.html

  • Leitch, A. M., & Bohensky, E. L. Return to ‘a new normal’: Discourses of resilience to natural disasters in Australian newspapers 2006–2010. Global Environmental Change, 2014: 26: 14-26.

https://pascalfrancis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28522758

  • Akbarian Ronizi, S, Ramazanzadeh, M, Analysis of farmers' resilience to drought with emphasis on economic factors and social capital in rural areas (Case study: Roniz village, Estahban city), Quarterly Journal of Rural Research, 2019: 10(2): 232-243.

https://jrur.ut.ac.ir/article_67931.html?lang=fa

  • Sadeghloo, T, Sojasi Qeidari, Investigating the relationship between the viability of rural settlements on the resilience of villagers against natural hazards in rural areas of Maraveh Tappeh and Palizan, Crisis Management Quarterly, 2016: 6: 37-44.

https://www.virascience.com/article/92962/

  • Pham, J. How to creat a resilient City Preventing community loss in the event of a natural disaster, Senior Research Project University of California, 2013: San Diego.
  • Hajian, N, Ghasemi, M. The role of diversity of agricultural and non-agricultural economic activities on the resilience of rural farming households exposed to drought, Geography and environmental hazards, 2018: 28, 31-51.

https://geoeh.um.ac.ir/article_32813.html?lang=fa

  • Wardekker, J. A., Jong, A., Knoop, J. M & Sluijs, J. P. Operationalizing a Resilience Approch to Adapting an Urban Delta to Uncertaing Climate Changes, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2010: 77, 987 - 998, DIO: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005.
  • Schmidt, D. H., Garland, K. A. Bone Dry in Texas: Resilience to Drought on the Upper Texas Gulf Coast, Journal of Planning Literature, 2012: 27(4), 434-445, DIO: http://100.1177/088541221245013.
  • Morkūnas M, Artiom V, Yuri B, Agota G. The role of government in forming agricultural policy: economic resilience measuring index exploited. Administratie si Management Public, 2018b; 31: 111-131. DOI: 10.24818/amp/2018.31-08.
  • Christopherson S, Michie J, Tyler P. Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,2010; 3: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsq004.
  • Ride, A. Community resilience in natural disasters. New York Palsgrave Macmillan, 2011.

https://anyflip.com/fupsg/npem/basic

  • Rezaei, M.R. Evaluationg the economic and institutional resilience of urban communities to natural disasters using PROMETHE technical, Journal of Emergency Management, 2013: 2(1), 27-38.

https://www.sid.ir/paper/226051/fa

https://www.joem.ir/article_3780.html

  • Svatoš M, Smutka L, Selby R. Capital Stock Value Development in Relation to the New EU Countries’ Agricultural Sector Development. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2015; 62(6): 1437-1450.

https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2014062061437.html

  • Hetty P. From food security to food and nutrition security: role of agriculture and farming systems for nutrition. Journal of Sustainable Food and Nutrition Security,2015; 109(3): 456-461

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280920903_Special_Section_Sustainable_Food_and_Nutrition_Security_From_food_security_to_food_and_nutrition_security_role_of_agriculture_and_farming_systems_for_nutrition

  • Gong J, Lin H. Sustainable development for agricultural region in China: case studies. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000; 128(1-2): 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127 (99)00269- 8.
  • Jafari, M, Rezvani, M. R, Faraji Sabokbar, H. A. Analysis of economic resilience of agricultural operators against the effects of drought, 2020, 10(39): 61-78.

https://jzpm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_3995.html

  • Tudor M. M. Agriculture role in social-economic resilience to majo economic crises in Romania. In Agrarian Economy and Rural Development-Realities and Perspectives for Romania. 8th Edition of the International Symposium (pp. 175-180). Bucharest: The Research Institute for Agricultural Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR).2017.

https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/85169.html

  • , Edwards. M. G., B. H. The social and economic impacts of drought., Australian Social Policy, 2018: 54: 22-31.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329845611_The_social_and_economic_impacts_of_drought

  • Morkūnas M, Artiom V, Yuri B, Agota G. The role of government in forming agricultural policy: economic resilience measuring index exploited. Administratie si Management Public, 2018b; 31: 111-131. DOI: 10.24818/amp/2018.31-08.
  • Yeganeh, A., Talebifard, R., Valaei, M. 2021. Analysis of economic viability in the villages of Malekan peri-urban areas. Journal of Urban Peripheral Development. Year 3, Number 1: 79-96.

https://www.jpusd.ir/article_130779.html

  • Maleki, M, Hasani, S.F. Identifying and prioritizing the effective factors in entrepreneurial marketing in small and medium enterprises (Q method), Master Thesis, Semnan University.
  • Khonifar, H, Moslemi, N. Principles and foundations of qualitative research methods, 2019, Negah Danesh Publications, Fourth Edition, Tehra