1-      Helping editorial decisions

The reviewers assist the editor of the journal in reviewing the quality, scientific content of

the articles or help to improve and enhance the quality and content of the articles through communication of the editorial members with the author.

2-      Speed ​​of  review

Selected reviewers must immediately inform the editor of the journal about the results after the initial review which include:

 Not reviewing the article due to the lack of subject in the field of referee specilty, lack of time, or...

Reviewing when accompanied by delays due to busy times, lack of access to sufficient facilities, and so on.

3-      Confidentiality of information

All information contained in the articles must be considered confidential by the reviewer..

4-      Reviewing by presenting scientific and transparent comments.Reviewing of articles must be based on scientific documents and sufficient reasoning must be clearly stated and these documents must be presented to journals and authors and refrain from expressing taste, personal, racial, and religious opinions, etc. in judging articles.

5-       Paying attention to the references used in the article

 Paying attention to the references used in the article is another task of the reviewers. All research, topics, and citations used in the article must be accompanied by a complete reference in the bibliography.

6-      Lack of reviewing articles for personal purposes