Impacts of Governments Fiscal Policies on Value Added of Agriculture and Industrial Sectors

Authors

• S.N. Mousavi
• H. Mohammadi
• S.M.R. Akbari

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the impacts of government expenditure on value added of agricultural and industrial sectors. To achieve the objective, Vector Autoregressive approach, causality analysis and Impulse Response Function analysis were used. The data collected from different sources including Iranian Statistical Center and Central Bank. Results of the study showed that causality is from government expenditure to agriculture value added, indicating positive impact of government expenditure on agricultural value added in the short run. It was also found that in short run government expenditure affects value added, export and investment of the industrial sector positively and significantly. Given the positive impact of the government expenditure on investment in agriculture, in both short and long-run, it is concluded that government expenditure in infrastructures results in improved transportation system which in turn, encourage more investment in agricultural sector.
 

Keywords

• Agricultural Sector
• Industrial Sector
• error correction model
• Fiscal Policy

20.1001.1.20086407.1389.2.8.7.3

---

References

1- Akbari, N. A., Sameti, M. and Hadian, A. 2003. The effect of government

expenditures on agricultural value added. Journal of Agricultural Economics

and Development. 41, 42 (1 & 2):166-137.

2- Arab, V. A. 2007. Ability of monetary and fiscal policies under the structural

bottlenecks exist in Iran: 70-1340. M.A. thesis. Economics Department, Shiraz

University. 

3- Bronson, and. A. 1999. Macroeconomic theory and policy. A. Shakeri

translation. Ney publishing.

4- Jafarzadeh Ghadimi, M. R. 1991. Effects of monetary and fiscal policies on

economic growth within the St. Louis model. MA thesis. Economics

Department, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran.

5- Ramezani, H. 1999. The effect of government spending on economic growth:

case of Iran, 75-1350. MA thesis. Economics Department, Shiraz University.

Shiraz.

6- Bruneau, C. and Brandt, O. D. 2003. Monetary and fiscal policy in the

transition to EMU: What do SVAR models tell us? Economic Modeling.

20:959-985.

7- Fetres, M. H. 1996. Monetary and fiscal policies of the government's major

agricultural variables in the period 70-1350. Journal of Agricultural Economics

and Development, 4 (3): 89-71.

8- Lewis, K. K. 1993. Are foreign exchange intervention and monetary policy

related and does it really matter? NBER Working Paper. 4377.

9- Majdzade Tabatabaie, Sh. 1997. Economic stabilization policies, effects on

real macroeconomic variables: A Case Study of Iran's economy. M.A. thesis.

Economics Department, Shiraz University. Shiraz.

10- Noferesty, M. 1999. Unit Root and Co integration in econometrics. Rasa

Press. Tehran.

11- Yousefi, M. and Jamalizade, H. 1999. Modeling value added and

investment in Iran. Selected statistical material. Iran.

12- Roy, S.D. and Darbha, G. 2000. Dynamics of money, output and price

interaction – someIndianevidence.Economics Modeling. 17: 559-588.

13- Samadi, A. H. and Tabande, F. 2000. Labor productivity, exports and

regressive vector model (VAR) empirical evidence of Iran's economy (1374-

1338). Proceedings of the sixth conference developed country exports. Chamber

of Commerce and Industry of Tabriz. 253-242.

14- Seddighi, H.R., Lawler, K.A. and Katos, A.V. 2000. Econometrics: A

practical approach. Routledge. London.

15- Shuji, Y. 1996. Sectoral cointegration, structural break and agriculture’s

role in the Chinese economy in 1952-92: A VAR approach. Applied Economics.

10(28):269-279.