The Effects of Economic Development and Urbanization on Pollution Emissions in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

    In this study, the effects of economic development and urbanization on environmental degradation in Iran were analyzed over the period of 1971- 2012. For this propose, the long and short run relationships between CO2 emission per capita as an environment degradation index and per capita national income, urbanization, energy consumption per capita and trade openness were investigated applying Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach. The empirical results revealed that the relationship between urbanization and CO2 emission per capita is inverted U-shaped and statistically significant. Also, the impact of national income per capita is positive and statistically significant and a 10 percent increase in national income would  increase CO2 emission by 8.5 and 7  percent respectively in long and short run. Moreover, a 10 percent increase in energy consumption is linked with 4.5 and 4 percent  growth in CO2 emission in long and short run, respectively. Although the impact of trade openness is positive on CO2 emission and statistically significant in short run, there is not significant impact in long run.

Keywords


- ابراهیمی، م. و آل مراد، م. (1388). شهرنشینی و مصرف انرژی در کشورهای عضو گروه D8، مجله مشهد پژوهی، 1(3): 18-1.
- بانک مرکزی ایران. (1393). پایگاه اطلاعاتی بانک مرکزی. اطلاعات سری زمانی.
- ترابی، ت.، خواجویی پور، ا.، طریقی، س. و پاکروان، م. (1394). تأثیر مصرف انرژی، رشد اقتصادی و تجارت خارجی بر انتشار گازهای گلخانه­ای در ایران. فصلنامه مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، 9(29): 84-63.
- ترنر و گری (1374). اقتصاد محیط زیست، ترجمه سیاوش دهقانیان، عوض کوچکی، علی کلاهی اهری، انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، چاپ اول 1374.
- فطرس، م. و معبودی، ر. (1389). رابطه علی مصرف انرژی، جمعیت شهرنشین و آلودگی محیط ‌زیست در ایران، 1385-1350. فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی،   7(27): 17-1.
- فطرس،م. و قربان سرشت، م. (1391). اثر رشد شهرنشینی بر مصرف انرژی و انتشار دی اکسید کربن: مقایسه سه نظریه. مطالعات‌ اقتصاد انرژی‌، 9(35): 168-147.
- فلاحی، ف. و حکمتی‌فرد، ص. (1392). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر مقدار انتشار گاز دی‌اکسیدکربن در استان‌های کشور (رهیافت داده‌های تابلویی)، پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، 2(6): 150-129.
- نوفرستی، م. (1378). ریشه واحد و هم‌جمعی در اقتصاد سنجی، موسسه خدمات فرهنگی رسا، چاپ اول، تهران.
Refrences
- Adkins, L. G., & Garbaccio, R. F. (2007). Coordinating Global Trade and Environmental Policy: The role of pre-existing distortions. In Tenth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Purdue University.
- Alam, S., Fatima, A., & Butt, M. S. (2007). Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation. Journal of Asian Economics, 18(5), 825-837.
- Ang, J. B. (2007). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4772-4778.
- Ang, J. B. (2008). Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(2), 271-278.
- Baek, J., & Kim, H. S. (2013). Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Economics, 36, 744-749.
- Chebbi, H. B. (2009, August). Investigating linkages between economic growth, energy consumption and pollutant emissions in Tunisia. In International Association of Agricultural Economists> 2009 Conference.
- Chintrakarn, P., & Millimet, D. L. (2006). The environmental consequences of trade: Evidence from subnational trade flows. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52(1), 430-453.
- Fosten, J., Morley, B., & Taylor, T. (2012). Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 76, 25-33.
- He, J., & Richard, P. (2010). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 1083-1093.
- Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2010). Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4057-4063.
- Jones, D. W. (1991). How urbanization affects energy-use in developing countries. Energy Policy, 19(7), 621-630.
- Kang, S. I., & Kim, J. J. (2004, June). A quantitative analysis of the environmental impact induced by free trade between Korea and Japan. In 7th annual Conference on Global economic analysis, trade, poverty, and the environment, Washington, DC United States.
- Kareem, S. D., Kari, F., Alam, G. M., Adewale, A., & Oke, O. K. (2012). Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth: China experience. Int. J. Appl. Econ. Financ, 6, 136-147.
- Kasman, A., & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97-103.
- Lantz, V., & Feng, Q. (2006). Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where's the EKC?. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 229-238.
- Li, H., Mu, H., Zhang, M. and Gui, S. 2012. Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China's energy – related CO2 emissions. Energy, 39:319–26.
- Lin, S., Zhao, D., & Marinova, D. (2009). Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(6), 341-347.
- Nejat, P., Jomehzadeh, F., Taheri, M. M., Gohari, M., & Majid, M. Z. A. (2015). A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 843-862.
- Pao, H. T., Yu, H. C., & Yang, Y. H. (2011). Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy, 36(8), 5094-5100.
- Pesaran, H.M. and B. Pesaran. (1997). Working with Microfit 4.0: An Introduction to Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371-413.
- Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
- Poumanyvong, P., & Kaneko, S. (2010). Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 434-444.
- Rafiq, S., Salim, R., & Nielsen, I. (2016). Urbanization, openness, emissions, and energy intensity: A study of increasingly urbanized emerging economies. Energy Economics, 56, 20-28.
- Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., Muzaffar, A. T., Ahmed, K., & Jabran, M. A. (2016). How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 83-93.
- Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., Hamdi, H., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecological Indicators, 45, 622-631.
- Siddiki, J. U. (2000). Demand for money in Bangladesh: a cointegration analysis. Applied Economics, 32(15), 1977-1984.
- Soytas, U., Sari, R., & Ewing, B. T. (2007). Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), 482-489.
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248.
- Wang, P., Wu, W., Zhu, B., & Wei, Y. (2013). Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy, 106, 65-71.
Zhang, Y. J., Yi, W. C., & Li, B. W. (2015). The impact of urbanization on carbon emission: empirical evidence in Beijing. Energy Procedia, 75, 2963-2968.