Spillover Effects of Meat Prices Volatility in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

This paper investigates spillover effects of volatility of lamb, beef and poultry prices using Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasitic (GARCH) model for period of 1997-2011. Findings of the study showed that the volatility of consumer meat prices had significant and positive spillover effects on the volatility of other prices. Moreover, the volatility of consumer prices had positive impact on its own volatility. The results of the study showed the presence of significant feedback among three meat prices under consideration indicating that each retail meat market used information from the other ones when forming their own price expectations. The presence of positive and significant price volatility spillover effects across various meat markets indicates that higher price volatility in one meat category increase price volatility in the others. This phenomenon causes market uncertainty and risk for consumers. On this basis, providing appropriate policy package in both demand and supply side of these commodities are recommended.

Keywords


  1. اسکندرپور. ب. کاوسی کلاشمی. م. رفیعی. ح. خلیق خیاوی. پ. 1393. قانون قیمت واحد و یکپارچگی در بازارهای جهانی خرما. تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی. شماره 23. 174-159.
  2. قهرمان­زاده. م. اشتیاقی. م. پیش بهار. ا. دشتی. ق. 1393. سرریز نوسان قیمت در بازار محصولات کشاورزی: مطالعه موردی بازار گوشت گوسفند استان آذربایجان شرقی. اقتصاد کشاورزی. شماره 33. 19-1.
  3. خلیق خیاوی. پ. کاوسی کلاشمی. م. ضیاء الحسام. س. م. 1393. بررسی اثرات سرریز نوسانات قیمت چای در ایران. اولین  همایش ملی چای. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد لاهیجان. 14 اسفند 1392. لاهیجان. ایران
  1. Alom. F. Ward. D. Hu. B. 2010. Cross country mean and volatility spillover effects of food prices: evidence for Asia and Pacific. International Review of Business Research Papers 6(5). 334 – 355.
  2. Buguk. C. Hudson. D. Hanson. T. 2003. Price volatility spillover in agricultural markets: an examination of U.S. catfish markets. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 28(1). 86-99.
  3. Berndt. E. K. Hall. H. B. Hall. R. E. Hausman. J. A. 1974. Estimation and inference in nonlinear structural models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 4. 653–666.
  4. Bettendorf. L. Verboven. F. 2000. Incomplete transmission of coffee bean prices: evidence from The Netherlands. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 27. 1–16.
  5. Binswanger. H. P. Rosenzweig. M. 1986. Behavioral and material determinates of production relations in agriculture. Journal of Development Studies. 22. 503–539.
  6. Bollerslev. T. 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31. 307–327.
  7. Bollerslev. T. Wooldridge. J. M. 1992. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariance. Econometric Reviews. 11. 143–172.
  8. Chou. R. 1988. Volatility persistence and stock valuations; some empirical evidence using GARCH. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 3. 279–294.
  9. Dickey. D. A. Fuller. W. A. 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with unit root. Econometrica. 49. 1057–1072.
  10. Elliot. G. Rothenberg. T. J. Stock. J. H. 1996. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica. 64. 813–836.
  11. Enders. W. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley.
  12. Engle. R. F. Bollerslev. T. 1986. Modeling the persistence of conditional variances. Econometric Review. 5. 1–50.
  13. Engle. R. F. Ito. T. Lin. W. 1990. Meteor showers or heat waves? Heteroskedastic intra-daily volatility in the foreign exchange market. Econometrica. 58. 525–542.
  14. Gardner. B. 1981. On the power of macroeconomic linkages to explain events in US agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68. 871–878.
  15. Goodwin. B. K. Holt. M. T. 1999. Price transmission and asymmetric adjustment in the U.S. beef sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 81. 630–637.
  16. Johansen. S. Juselius. K. 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 52. 169–210.
  17. Perron. P. 1990. Testing for unit root in a time series with a changing mean. Journal of Business Economics and Statistics. 8. 152–162.
  18. Rezitis. A. 2003. Agricultural price volatility spillover effects: the case of Greece. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 30(3). 389-406.
  19. Rezitis. A. 2003. Volatility spillover effect in Greece consumer meat prices. Agricultural Economics Review. 4(1). 29-36.
  20. Saha. A. Delgado. C. 1989. The nature and implications for market interventions of seasonal food price variability. In D. Sahn (ed.), Seasonal Variability in Third World Agriculture: the Consequences for Food Security. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Sims. C. 1980. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica. 48. 1–48.
  22. Trujillo-Barrera. A. Mallory. M. Garcia. P. 2011. Volatility spillovers in the U.S.crude oil, corn, and ethanol markets. Paper presented at the NCCC-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis,Forecasting, and Market Risk Management. St. Louis. Missouri. April 18-19.
  23. Tsay. R. 1987. Conditional heteroskedastic time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 82. 590–604.
  24. Varangis. P. N. 1992. On the interactions between the variances of money supply, agricultural prices and industrial prices. Greek Economic Review. 14. 129–149.
  25. Weaver. R. D. Natcher. W. 2000. Has market reform exposed farmers to greater price volatility? In: Farm Economics. Cooperative Extension Service, US Department of Agriculture. College Station, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
  26. Zanias. G. P. 1998. Inflation, agricultural prices and economic convergence in Greece. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 25. 19–29.